Comment

Comment by Lesley Tobin on August 20, 2010 at 3:27pm

The ICPC Nanonet project (EU funded under FP7) is aimed at networking nanoscientists and researchers across the globe to help bridge the nano divide and avoid a knowledge apartheid.

It offers a free open access Nano Archive of nearly 7,000 items including many full texts at http://www.nanoarchive.org. Please contact me if you would like to archive your research and I will create an editor's account for you.

You can join the international network at http://www.icpc-nanonet.org. Registration is free. The website also contains information for parties interested in FP7 collaboration, details of free webinars taking place (three in September), information about researchers and organisations and much more.

I am also interested in communicating with researchers in sub-Saharan Africa for the annual region report. If you would like your institution's research showcased in the report, please get in touchDelete Comment

Comment by bhavesh kamaliya on February 22, 2010 at 8:18am

how can we utilise rolling nanoimprint lithography for large scale production?

Comment by Dr R S Jadoun on July 25, 2009 at 7:00am

Thank you for the invitation

Comment by Zahir Iqbal on July 23, 2009 at 7:32am

Hello Georgette,

My topic is magnetic nanoparticles. Have you done work in this field?

Comment by Zahir Iqbal on July 23, 2009 at 7:29am

Hello
How are you ?

Comment by sosolar on July 23, 2009 at 2:35am

is harmony between nature, man, and technology a taboo subject? predictions of standards for future living aside. Yes, competing forces always exist. Per R.Buckminster Fuller's problems about manufacturing the dymaxion car, much less other ingenious things. But things eventually shake out, if the development is good enough. For example, many a typesetter lost his job when computer printing came along....i say thinking aloud with one another, as we do here, should be FREE of restraint....let the capitalists work it out. Do excellent science, eventually something gets through. Think about the rich NASA spin off companies, They aren't dead. PIPING OFF once carried the simple moniker "FREE SPEECH". Academic freedom.

Comment by Dr. Murugesan Subbiah on July 23, 2009 at 2:12am

.

Comment by mikal haley on July 22, 2009 at 8:56pm

it stands to reason that: because the standards for future living are not yet known, but exist as theories and variables -- that not too many people are brave enough to create a topic for the discussion of nanotechnology and our place in it.

i bet it has political implications, though. although where to begin? is the technological application efficient enough that it runs the risk of rendering existing technologies obsolescent?

if it is,
you can bet that those competitors are looking for ways to slow the invention and implementation process...

Comment by sosolar on February 27, 2009 at 6:44am

I am interested in learning more about exactly where nanoprinting already exists in manufacturing, if at all. It strikes me that it has to be availble outside research, no?

Comment by Georgette on March 26, 2008 at 8:48am

Does someone has a nice topic to discuss here?